نقش پیچیدگی محلی در ناسازگاری مشاهدهپذیرهای کوانتومی
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67753/frsj.v3i2.209Keywords:
اطلاعات کوانتومی، اندازهگیری کوانتومی، پیچیدگی محلی، جابجاگرها، مشاهدهپذیرهای ناسازگار، میخکانیک کوانتومیAbstract
The Role of Local Complexity in the Incompatibility of Quantum Observables
Hamed Tayeb, Yama Aseel
Abstract
The incompatibility of quantum observables is one of the fundamental concepts in quantum mechanics, rooted in the mathematical structure of quantum operators and the uncertainty principle. It plays a pivotal role in explaining the behavior of quantum systems, measurement theory, quantum information processing, and quantum computation. In recent years, alongside the rapid development of quantum information and quantum complexity research, increasing attention has been devoted to investigating the factors influencing the behavior of incompatible observables and their relationship with the informational structure of quantum systems. Despite extensive studies on observable incompatibility and quantum complexity, the role of local complexity in the emergence and enhancement of observable incompatibility has not yet been fully clarified. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate and elucidate the role of local complexity in the incompatibility of quantum observables and to analyze the influence of the local interaction structure on measurement behavior in quantum systems. This study employs a descriptive–analytical approach based on an extensive review of authoritative scientific literature, drawing upon operator theory, commutator algebra, quantum information theory, and quantum many-body models. Within this framework, the relationship among local complexity, quantum information distribution, quantum entanglement, and the degree of observable incompatibility is systematically examined, and a conceptual framework is proposed to explain these interrelationships. The findings indicate that increasing local complexity in many quantum systems can enhance quantum correlations and modify the structure of the relevant commutators, thereby influencing the degree of observable incompatibility. Furthermore, the results suggest that local complexity can be regarded as a key factor in improving the understanding of quantum measurement processes, quantum decoherence, and the development of advanced quantum information systems.
Keywords: Commutator; Incompatible Quantum Observables; Local Complexity; Quantum Mechanics; Quantum Information; Quantum Measurement
References
Aaronson, S. (2013). Quantum computing since Democritus. Cambridge University Press.
Anand, N., et al. (2023). Operator entanglement and quantum information dynamics. Physical Review Letters.
Ballentine, L. E. (2014). Quantum mechanics: A modern development (2nd ed.). World Scientific.
Bennett, C. H., & Brassard, G. (1984). Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing (pp. 175–179).
Bhattacharyya, R., et al. (2022). Quantum chaos and out-of-time-order correlators in many-body systems. Physical Review B.
Brown, A. R., et al. (2016). Complexity, action, and black holes. Physical Review D, 93(8), 086006.
Busch, P., Lahti, P., & Werner, R. F. (2016). Quantum root-mean-square error and measurement uncertainty relations. Reviews of Modern Physics, 86(4), 1261–1281.
Chen, X., et al. (2024). Joint measurement of incompatible quantum observables. Physical Review A.
Cohen-Tannoudji, C., Diu, B., & Laloë, F. (2020). Quantum mechanics (Vols. 1–2). Wiley.
Ehrenberg, A., et al. (2022). Local structure and complexity in quantum many-body systems. Physical Review Letters.
Farkas, M., & Mitra, A. (2023). Measurement incompatibility and quantum information processing. Physical Review A.
Griffiths, D. J., & Schroeter, D. F. (2018). Introduction to quantum mechanics (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Gühne, O., et al. (2021). Incompatibility of quantum measurements: A review. Reports on Progress in Physics.
Hall, B. C. (2013). Quantum theory for mathematicians. Springer.
Heisenberg, W. (1927). Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik. Zeitschrift für Physik, 43, 172–198.
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., & Horodecki, K. (2009). Quantum entanglement. Reviews of Modern Physics, 81(2), 865–942.
Laflorencie, N. (2016). Quantum entanglement in condensed matter systems. Physics Reports, 646, 1–59.
Liu, Y., et al. (2018). Quantum information scrambling and local complexity. Physical Review Letters.
Maldacena, J., Shenker, S. H., & Stanford, D. (2016). A bound on chaos. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2016(8), 106.
Napolitano, J., & Sakurai, J. J. (2020). Modern quantum mechanics (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Nature Index. (2025). Nature Index. Nature Research.
Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2010). Quantum computation and quantum information (10th anniversary ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Nielsen, M. A., et al. (2006). Quantum computation and many-body complexity. Cambridge University Press.
Orús, R. (2014). A practical introduction to tensor networks. Annals of Physics, 349, 117–158.
Preskill, J. (2018). Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum, 2, 79.
Robertson, H. P. (1929). The uncertainty principle. Physical Review, 34(1), 163–164.
Shankar, R. (2012). Principles of quantum mechanics (2nd ed.). Springer.
Shankar, R. (2020). Fundamentals of physics: Quantum mechanics. Yale University Press.
Susskind, L. (2018). Three lectures on complexity and black holes. Springer.
Swingle, B., et al. (2016). Measuring the scrambling of quantum information. Physical Review A.
Swingle, B., & Xu, S. (2024). Quantum information dynamics and local complexity. Nature Physics.
Tendick, A., et al. (2023). Distributed incompatibility of quantum measurements. Physical Review A.
Uola, R., et al. (2020). Quantum resource theory of incompatibility. Physical Review Letters.
Von Neumann, J. (1955). Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics. Princeton University Press.
Watrous, J. (2018). The theory of quantum information. Cambridge University Press.
Wiseman, H. M., & Milburn, G. J. (2010). Quantum measurement and control. Cambridge University Press.
Yoshida, B., & Roberts, D. A. (2017). Chaos and operator growth in quantum systems. Physical Review Letters.
Zhang, Y. (2020). Local complexity and quantum information dynamics. Physical Review.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Farah Research and Scientific Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
